Announcements
How can I make this newsletter better for you?
I'm on vacation for the eclipse. So instead of the usual Monday post, I have a request: tell me what you want!
Elise Cutts is a science journalist and ex-scientist. She writes a newsletter called Reviewer, too.
Announcements
I'm on vacation for the eclipse. So instead of the usual Monday post, I have a request: tell me what you want!
Monday Edition
Also: Montana's "right to try" law for experimental cures, UK science gets reshuffled, a university sues Anthropic over patents, and more from last week
Monday Edition
Also: The "Science: A New Golden Age" report, layoffs at National Geographic, and studies on the consequences of AI adoption in research
Monday Edition
Also: Attention as a class issue, an anti-AI editorial containing AI links, and a Thiel-backed journalist-rating startup
Monday Edition
Also: AI conflict of interest disclosures in philosophy, PhD admission down 15% at US universities, an AI "humanizer" tool for science, and more from last week
Monday Edition
Also: Avi Loeb to head White House UFO committee, overworked ERC peer reviewers, Anthropic's push for AI in science, and more from last week
Monday Edition
Also: SciAm sold, two Max Planck papers retracted, a big study links AI to skill atrophy in schoolkids, and more from last week
The newsletter is back with a new focus on the systems, instincts, and incentives that shape what's discovered, what's believed, and what happens when science hits the real world
Rant
Jared Isaacman's Pluto push is a master class in science populism
Let's talk about science, science communication, and how knowledge matters
TLDR
I am weirdly hopeful that it could be easier to notice biased AI than biased humans?
Science Communication
Technically correct is not, in fact, the best kind of correct in scicomm